Dfinity Foundation v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20223:22-cv-02632California7,824 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 DFINITY FOUNDATION, Case No. 22-cv-02632-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v.

DISMISS

META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant.

Plaintiff Dfinity Foundation (“Dfinity”) alleges that Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) infringed two of its trademarks, the Dfinity Mark and the Rainbow Mark (together, the “Dfinity Marks”) by Meta’s use of a new mark after its rebranding (the “Meta Mark”). See FAC (dkt. 29). Meta moves to dismiss. Mot. (dkt. 34). As explained below, finding this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court GRANTS Meta’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Dfinity alleges the following: Dfinity is a nonprofit organization that runs the Internet Computer, a public blockchain network. FAC ¶ 7. Dfinity seeks to “provid[e] millions of developers and entrepreneurs with a public compute platform—creating a revolutionary new way to build websites,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.