Schultz

Schultz v. The Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20223:20-cv-04058California1,028 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRENDAN SCHULTZ, Case No. 20-cv-04058-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT; AFFORDING

THE HARRY S. TRUMAN PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND

SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION,

Re: Dkt. No. 48 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is defendant Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation’s (“Foundation”) “Motion,” filed October 14, 2022, “to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint” (“TAC”). On October 28, 2022, plaintiff Brendan Schultz (“Schultz”) filed his “Response,” to which the Foundation has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for decision on the parties’ respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for November 18, 2022, and rules as follows. In the TAC, Schultz alleges the Foundation violated his rights under the Fifth Amendment and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.