Resh, Inc v. Skimlite Manufacturing Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20225:22-cv-01427California1,636 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 RESH, INC, Case No. 22-cv-01427-EJD (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE OCTOBER 28, 2022

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE

SKIMLITE MANUFACTURING INC, et Re: Dkt. No. 41 al., 12 Defendants.

13 Defendants Skimlite Manufacturing, Inc. (“Skimlite”), Barrett Conrad, and James Conrad ask the Court to order plaintiff Resh, Inc. (“Resh”) to respond to Skimlite’s Interrogatories Nos. 1 and 2. Dkt. No. 41. The Court finds this dispute suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court orders Resh to provide substantive responses to the interrogatories. I. BACKGROUND In this action, Resh alleges that all defendants infringe its U.S. Patent No. 11,141,852, which is directed to a telescoping pole for cleaning pools. Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 24, Ex. A. As required by this Court’s Patent Local Rules and the operative scheduling order, the parties have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.