Dawson
Dawson v. Uber Technologies Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 COURTNEY DAWSON, Case No. 3:20-cv-06736-WHO
Plaintiff,
DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO
v. PROSECUTE
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 49, 50, 51, 52 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff Courtney Dawson filed a notice of voluntary dismissal on October 4, 2022, seeking dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 41(a). Dkt. No. 49. Defendant Uber Technologies filed a status report that same day, seeking dismissal with prejudice under FRCP 41(b) for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 50. I ordered Dawson to show cause why the case should not be dismissed with prejudice under FRCP 41(a), given her repeated failure to move this case forward or comply with my arbitration order for the past year and a half. See Dkt. No. 51. Dawson filed a response on October 22, 2022, saying that she “shares the Court’s concern about preservation of judicial economy and resources” and has “no intention of pursuing this case further”…