Loughborough Surface Analysis LTD v. Capital Asset Exchange and Trading, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20225:21-cv-01115California1,834 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 LOUGHBOROUGH SURFACE Case No. 21-cv-01115-BLF

ANALYSIS LTD,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT

CAPITAL ASSET EXCHANGE AND

TRADING, LLC,

Defendant.

13 Before the Court is Defendant Capital Asset Exchange and Trading, LLC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. See ECF No. 38 (“MSJ” or “Motion”); see also ECF No. 41 (“Reply”). CAET seeks summary judgment on two of three claims in Plaintiff Loughborough Surface Analysis Limited’s First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 30 (“FAC”)), arguing that LSA cannot prove fraud or negligent misrepresentation by CAET. LSA opposes summary judgment on both claims. See ECF No. 39 (“Opp.”). The Court held a hearing on this Motion on November 3, 2022. For the reasons stated on the record and explained below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND Beginning in August…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.