Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOSE ALFREDO LOPEZ, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01954-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR

EXPERIAN INFORMATION RECONSIDERATION

SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendant.

15 Plaintiffs seek leave to file a motion to reconsider the order entered May 18, 2022, granting partial summary judgment to Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”). The motion is premised on an interpretive rule issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) in July 2022 regarding the “permissible purpose clause of the FCRA,” which was addressed in the May 2022 order. Dkt. 143, at 3–4. Under this new rule, Plaintiffs contend, summary judgment should have been denied as to their permissible purposes claims for Experian’s conduct prior to May 2018. The motion is denied. First, Plaintiffs have offered no explanation for why they seek reconsideration roughly…