Rouse

Rouse v. Abernathy

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20223:21-cv-05708California2,030 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 XEZAKIA ROUSE, Case No. 21-cv-05708-JSC

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S

DISCOVERY REQUESTS,

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO AMEND, AND DEFENDANT’S

RONALD HAYES ABERNETHY, MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 35, 40, 44, 55,

12 Plaintiff brings Section 1983 claims and a legal malpractice claim against his former public defender. (Dkt. No. 14; see Dkt. No. 13.) Before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery responses from City of Napa and Napa County officials, (Dkt. No. 35); Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery responses from City of Napa 911 Communications Manager Gus Ulloth, (Dkt. No. 40; see Dkt. Nos. 42, 48, 50, 52); Plaintiff’s letter requesting issuance of subpoenas, (Dkt. No. 61); Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend, (Dkt. No. 44 at 23–25; see Dkt. No. 45); and Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, (Dkt. No. 55; see Dkt. Nos. 56, 60, 62, 63, 64,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.