Crown Cell Inc. v. Ecovacs Robotics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20223:21-cv-07890California2,968 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CROWN CELL INC, Case No. 21-cv-07890-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT

ECOVACS ROBOTICS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 63 Defendant.

12 Defendant Ecovacs Robotics, Inc. (“Ecovacs”) has filed a motion to dismiss the third amended complaint of plaintiff Crown Cell Inc. (“Crown Cell”). Dkt. No. 63. The Court found this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for November 18, 2022, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion to dismiss. 18 BACKGROUND The factual and procedural background of this case is set forth more fully in the Court’s prior order. See Dkt. No. 50. Briefly stated, Crown Cell’s primary business is the sale and resale of products on Amazon’s online marketplace. Dkt. No. 59 (“TAC”) ¶ 15. Between August 2019 and December 2020,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.