Davis
Davis v. Rebel Creamery LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 ANGELA DAVIS, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04111-TSH
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE MOTION FOR
ALTERNATIVE SERVICE
REBEL CREAMERY LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 12 Defendant.
11 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Angela Davis and Bonnie Bennett bring this putative class action against Rebel Creamery LLC, alleging Rebel falsely marketed its ice cream as healthier than other ice creams in the marketplace. Plaintiffs now move the Court to permit alternative service on Rebel pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. ECF No. 12. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion WITHOUT PREJUDICE and EXTENDS the deadline to complete service to December 16, 2022. II. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed this case on July 13, 2022, alleging Rebel “engages in a deceptive marketing campaign to convince consumers that [its] Products are nutritious and healthful to …