Nyambi

Nyambi v. Humboldt County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20223:22-cv-05212California1,574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

13 Plaintiff, an inmate at the San Francisco County Jail who is proceeding without 14 representation by an attorney, filed this pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. ' 1983 15 against the Humboldt County Sherriff’s Department. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma 16 pauperis is granted in a separate order. For the reasons explained below, the complaint is 17 dismissed with leave to amend.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

19 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint “is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” Id. § 1915A(b). Pleadings filed by parties unrepresented by a lawyer must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.