Sarmiento

Sarmiento v. Marquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20224:21-cv-06712California6,198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIELLE SARMIENTO, et al., Case No. 21-cv-06712-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL

RUBY MARQUEZ, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 56 Defendants.

13 Defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint came on for hearing before this court on November 3, 2022. Plaintiffs appeared through their counsel, David P. Morales. Defendants appeared through their counsel, Melissa C. Shaw. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS defendants’ motion, for the following reasons. BACKGROUND This is a § 1983 case involving alleged religious discrimination and deprivation of Due Process by the Santa Cruz County Human Services Department over the course of several administrative and judicial proceedings. Plaintiffs Danielle Sarmiento and Michael Sanchez are the former foster…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.