Miletak

Miletak v. Acuity Mutual Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20225:22-cv-00633California2,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NICK MILETAK, Case No. 22-cv-00633-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. RULE 11 SANCTIONS MOTION

ACUITY MUTUAL INSURANCE [Re: ECF No. 66]

COMPANY,

11 Defendant. 12 In this case, pro se Plaintiff Nick Miletak sues Defendant Acuity Mutual Insurance Company for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and intentional interference with economic advantage. Miletak alleges that Darcel Lang, an employee of Acuity, falsely reported Miletak to Miletak’s employer about improper conduct related to an insurance claim made by Miletak’s goddaughter. Miletak alleges that the report caused him humiliation and led him to resign from his employment. Miletak filed this lawsuit in Santa Clara Superior Court on November 10, 2021. See ECF No. 6–1. Defendant Darcel Lang brought a cross-claim for defamation, which accompanied Defendants’ Answer. See ECF No. 6–2. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.