Diaz

Diaz v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20225:20-cv-06906California1,691 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 L.D., Case No. 20-cv-06906-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendant.

13 On March 31, 2022, the Court granted-in-part and denied-in-part each party’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 22. The Court remanded plaintiff L.D.’s1 case for further proceedings, finding that the ALJ erred in assessing the medical opinions and in considering L.D.’s borderline age situation. See id. Now pending before the Court is defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) motion to alter or amend the Court’s judgment as to its finding regarding L.D.’s borderline age situation, and to remand the case based solely on the assignment of error as to the medical opinions. Dkt. No. 24. L.D. opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 25. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies the Commissioner’s motion.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.