Johnson v. Tirone & Tuan Investments, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20225:21-cv-08370California1,839 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-08370-SVK

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

AND SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT

TIRONE & TUAN INVESTMENTS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendant.

Plaintiff Scott Johnson filed this action for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act. Dkt. 1. The named defendant is Tirone & Tuan Investments, Inc. (“Defendant”). Id. Plaintiff contends that at the times relevant to Plaintiff’s complaint, Defendant owned Big T’s Seafood Market Bar located at 1694 Tully Road, San Jose, California. Id. at ¶¶ 2-3. Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for entry of a default judgment against Defendant. Dkt. 15. Defendant has not appeared in the action or opposed the motion for default judgment. The Court deems the motion for default judgment appropriate for determination without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.