Pittman

Pittman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20225:22-cv-03806California2,950 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 RANDY DEWAYNE PITTMAN, Case No. 22-cv-03806-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR

v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AS

MOOT; DENYING AND DISMISSING

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., ALL PENDING MOTIONS Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 9, 15, 20, 22, 32, 33, 41,

13 Randy Dewayne Pittman is currently in the custody of the U.S. Marshal at the Santa Rita Jail (“Jail”) in Dublin, California. Mr. Pittman initiated this action in pro se by filing a form complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. However, based on the contents of that complaint and a subsequent “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” filed by Mr. Pittman, (Dkt. No. 5), the Court determined that he had intended to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging the execution of his federal sentence, rather than a § 1983 action. Dkt. No. 7. The Court ordered Respondents to respond no later…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.