Alkutkar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HARSH ALKUTKAR, Case No. 22-cv-00422-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER DENYING

RECONSIDERATION

BUMBLE INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 53 Defendants.

13 Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the order compelling arbitration. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND Plaintiff sued defendants for violations of consumer protection laws based on defendants’ allegedly misleading advertisements regarding the special features available for purchase in the Bumble online dating app. Dkt. 1. Defendants responded by simultaneously moving to dismiss the complaint and moving to compel arbitration. Dkt. 28, Dkt. 30. Following briefing of both motions and a hearing, the court granted …