Diggs

Diggs v. Clenindimd

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20223:19-cv-06517California3,791 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL LAROY DIGGS, Case No. 19-cv-06517-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

AMY DAVIS, et al., Docket No. 52 Defendants.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION In this pro se prisoner’s civil rights action, Michael La Roy Diggs, an inmate at the Patton State Hospital, complains about events and omissions at Napa State Hospital, where he earlier was housed. This matter is now before the Court for consideration of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. See Docket No. 52 (“MSJ” or “Summary Judgment Motion”). This order DENIES Defendants’ motion because there are triable issues of material fact as to Mr. Diggs’s claim. The Court will refer this case to the Pro Se Prisoner Mediation Program. II. BACKGROUND Mr. Diggs alleges that, while detained at Napa State Hospital, he was forced to attend a 12- step substance abuse recovery treatment program…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.