Li

Li v. Taliguli

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20225:22-cv-07188California789 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VIVIAN Y. LI, Case No. 22-cv-07188 NC Plaintiff,

ORDER TO DEFENDANTS TO

v. SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE

SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED

BALATI YAKUFUJIANG and BACK TO STATE COURT FOR

YUSUFU TALIGULI, LACK OF FEDERAL SUBJECT

MATTER JURISDICTION Defendants. Re: ECF

17 Defendants Balati Yakufujiang and Yusufu Taliguli removed this unlawful detainer case to this court from Santa Clara County Superior Court on November 16, 2022. ECF 1. This Order requires the Defendants to “show cause” by filing a written response by December 9, 2022, explaining why the case should not be remanded back to Superior Court. The federal courts are courts of “limited jurisdiction” and only have jurisdiction as authorized by the Constitution and Congress. Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365, 374 (1978). The party seeking to invoke federal court jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.