Flores

Bala Rama Sundara Krishna Kireeti Mantripragada v. Flores

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20225:22-cv-02012California6,338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 BALA RAMA SUNDARA KRISHNA Case No. 22-cv-02012-VKD KIREETI MANTRIPRAGADA, et al., 9 Petitioners, ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION v. Re: Dkt. No. 18 PETE FLORES, et al., 12 Respondents.

13 In this immigration matter, petitioners Bala Rama Sundara Krishna Kireeti Mantripragada and Himani Mangasomayajula filed a “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus or in the Alternative Writ of Error Coram Nobis,” challenging their removal to India and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. Dkt. No. 1. Respondents move pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss the petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim for relief. Petitioners oppose the motion. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the oral arguments presented, the Court grants respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition.2 I. BACKGROUND…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.