Epidemic Sound, AB v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20223:22-cv-04223California311 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 EPIDEMIC SOUND, AB, Case No. 22-cv-04223-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

v. 8 Re: Dkt. No. 29 META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant.

11 Epidemic Sound (“Plaintiff”) brings this lawsuit for copyright infringement against Meta Platforms (“Defendant”). (Dkt. No. 1.) Defendant moves to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 29.) In the alternative, Defendant moves for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e). (Id.) After carefully considering the briefing submitted, the Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), vacates the hearing scheduled for December 1, 2022, GRANTS the request for judicial notice, and DENIES Defendant’s motion. The complaint provides “fair notice of what the . . . claim is and the grounds upon which it rests,” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (cleaned up), and Plaintiff pleads “factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.