Terlato Wine Group, Ltd. v. Federal Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20223:22-cv-04075California2,932 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 TERLATO WINE GROUP, LTD., Case No. 22-cv-04075-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendant.

10 Terlato Wine Group brings this suit against Federal Insurance Company for breach of contract. (Dkt. No. 1.) Defendant moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). After carefully reviewing the briefing, the Court concludes that oral argument is not required, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the December 1, 2022 hearing, and DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the dispute and Plaintiff states a claim for breach of contract. BACKGROUND I. Complaint Allegations Terlato Wine Group owns the Rutherford Hill and Chimney Rock wineries in Napa County, California. (Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 2.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.