Raimondo

Oceana, Inc. v. Raimondo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20225:21-cv-05407California7,910 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 OCEANA, INC., Case No. 21-cv-05407-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART OCEANA, INC.'S

MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLETION

GINA RAIMONDO, et al., OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

13 In this action, plaintiff Oceana, Inc. (“Oceana”) challenges a final agency action, the National Marine Fisheries Service’s (“NMFS”) approval of Amendment 18 to the Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries Management Plan. Dkt. No. 1 ¶¶ 1–12. Amendment 18 is a rebuilding plan for the Pacific sardine. Id. ¶ 76. Oceana brings its challenge pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (“MSA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq., and the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, defendants prepared and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.