Thompson

Thompson v. City of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20225:22-cv-07186California424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARK THOMPSON, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07186-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DISSOLVING NOVEMBER 16,

v. 2022 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 11 Defendants.

12 On November 16, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) without notice to Defendants and without giving Defendants the opportunity to respond. (Dkt. No. 11.) Defendants later filed an opposition and the Court held a hearing on the motion on November 29, 2022, during which Defendants, Plaintiffs in this case, and Plaintiffs in the now-consolidated Cummings case (formerly No. 22-cv-07481-JST) were heard. In light of Defendants’ evidence, the TRO is dissolved. Defendants’ evidence shows they provided Plaintiffs notice of the Columbus Park encampment abatement. Under the abatement plan, residents can sign up for housing and other services (as many Plaintiffs have already done); receive a placard to allow them to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.