Clancy
Clancy v. Mancuso
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NORMAN CLANCY, Case No. 22-cv-02381-BLF
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO
v. AMEND; AND ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF SHOULD
JERRY MANCUSO; GERALD BITTNER; NOT BE DECLARED A VEXATIOUS and KEITH COOPER, LITIGANT 12 Defendants. [Re: ECF 7, 21]
15 This is the latest in a series of lawsuits that pro se Plaintiff Norman Clancy (“Clancy”) has filed regarding dental services provided to him by Defendants Jerry Mancuso (“Mancuso”), Gerald Bittner (“Bittner”), and Keith Cooper (“Cooper”). In this suit, Clancy asserts a single claim under the federal criminal mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, based on Defendants’ alleged scheme to defraud him in connection with the dental work. See Compl. at 3, ECF 1.1 Clancy has voluntarily dismissed Bittner from the suit. The remaining defendants, Mancuso and Cooper, have filed…