Maciel

Maciel v. M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20223:22-cv-03885California4,576 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IGNACIO MACIEL, et al., Case No. 22-cv-03885-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

M.A.C. COSMETICS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendant.

12 Ignacio Maciel and Ruth Torres bring a putative class action against MAC Cosmetics (“MAC”) for violations of the California Labor Code and California’s Unfair Competition Law. Plaintiffs allege MAC did not reimburse its employees for necessary work-related expenditures. MAC removed the case to the Northern District of California pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) and Plaintiffs subsequently moved to remand the case to state court. (Dkt. No. 10.) That motion is now pending before the Court. After considering the parties’ briefing, and having had the benefit of oral argument on September 29, 2022, and the parties’ post-hearing submissions, Plaintiffs’ motion to remand is GRANTED. MAC has not met its burden to establish this Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.