Jones

Jones v. Mora

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20223:20-cv-04093California3,916 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMOS JONES, Case No. 20-cv-04093-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 59, 63 S. MORA, et al., Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motions in Limine, ECF No. 59, and Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine, ECF No. 63. On December 1, 2022, the Court held a Pretrial Conference and heard oral argument on the motions in limine. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motions in Limine Nos. 1–4, GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine No. 1, GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 2, GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 3, and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 4. A. Defendants’ Motions in Limine 1. Defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 1 Defendants move to exclude evidence of inmates’ grievances and lawsuits against Defendants. ECF No. 59 at 2. Defendants argue this evidence is hearsay, improper character evidence, unfairly prejudicial, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.