Kyle Zoellner v. Eric Losey

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20223:18-cv-04471California1,175 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KYLE CHRISTOPHER ZOELLNER, Case No. 18-cv-04471-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR SANCTIONS

CITY OF ARCATA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 382 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37 and 11. (Dkt. No. 382.) Having carefully considered the submissions, including by non-party Maggie Fleming, and having given the parties the opportunity for oral argument on December 1, 2022, the Court DENIES the motion. DISCUSSION Plaintiff seeks sanctions pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(c)(1) and 11 related to five categories of documents that he contends were not timely produced: (1) a written fiber report by the Department of Justice; (2) a 2020 email from non-party District Attorney Maggie Fleming to the Arcata Police Chief; (3) April 2017 emails between Chief Tom Chapman and Ms. Fleming; (4) 21 pages of police reports;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.