Pierce
Pierce v. County of San Francisco
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JILLIAN PIERCE, NICOLE WADE, Case No. 19-cv-07659-JSW
FANTASY DECUIR, DAMENA PAGE,
VINCENT KEITH BELL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, Re: Dkt. Nos. 91, 94, 98 11 v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, VICKI HENNESSAEY,
MICHELE FISHER, PAUL MIYAMOTO,
DOES 1-50, Defendants.
17 Now before the Court are the two motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants City 18 and County of San Francisco, Vicki Hennessy, Michele Fisher, and Paul Miyamoto (collectively, 19 “Defendants”) regarding the outdoor recreation claim and the cross-gender search claim. Also 20 before the Court is the motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs Jillian Pierce, Nicole 21 Wade, Fantasy Decuir, Damena Page, and Vincent Keith Bell (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) regarding 22 the outdoor recreation claim. 23 For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants and DENIES the motion for summary…