Bruggeman
Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., LTD. v. Bruggeman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 JIAXING SUPER LIGHTING ELECTRIC Case No. 21-cv-08489-MMC
APPLIANCE CO., LTD.,
5 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT v. SIGNIFY HOLDING B.V.’S MOTION TO DISMISS JOHN BRUGGEMAN, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 Before the Court is the “Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6),” filed July 18, 2022, by defendant Signify Holding B.V. (“Signify”). Plaintiff Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. (“Super Lighting”) has filed opposition, to which Signify has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 FACTUAL BACKGROUND2 Plaintiff Super Lighting, a lighting manufacturer, supplied traditional LED lighting products to nominal defendant Lunera Lighting, Inc. (“Lunera”), a distributor, pursuant to a Purchase and Development Agreement (hereinafter, “the…