Kleidman

Kleidman v. Murphy

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20224:22-cv-06355California526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 PETER KLEIDMAN, Case No. 22-cv-06355-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY THE COURT v. SHOULD NOT DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF BERNIE MURPHY, and others, SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION Defendants. Re: ECF 5 16 Plaintiff Peter Kleidman filed this action in federal court on October 21, 2022. Plaintiff failed to plead the domiciles of himself and Defendant Leslie Quist to establish diversity jurisdiction. The Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause as to why the action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See ECF 4. Plaintiff filed a response to the Court’s order stating that he is “a resident of New England.” ECF 5 ¶ 3. This response remains inadequate to establish the Court’s jurisdiction. Therefore, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.