Price

Price v. Wells Fargo & Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20223:22-cv-03128California1,018 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANISHA LEE PRICE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-03128-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL

v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 35 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs bring state law wage and hour claims against their current and former employer Wells Fargo & Company, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (collectively “Wells Fargo”). Wells Fargo moves for partial judgment on the pleadings as to Plaintiffs’ ninth claim for relief under California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), California Business and Professions Code § 17200, et seq. (Dkt. No. 35.) Having considered the parties’ briefs and having had the benefit of oral argument on November 30, 2022, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART. The Court lacks equitable jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ claim for restitution, but Plaintiffs’ claim for prospective injunctive relief is adequately alleged. DISCUSSION Wells…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.