R.

R. v. Blue Shield of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20223:22-cv-07707California640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

CENTRAL DIVISION

R.R., and E.R., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

Plaintiffs, MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

v. CALIFORNIA (DOC. NO. 17)

BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA,

Case No. 2:22-cv-00502 Defendant. District Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr.

Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg

Plaintiffs R.R. and E.R. brought this Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) action against Defendant Blue Shield of California. The parties have filed a Stipulated Motion to Change Venue to the Northern District of California. Because the parties have shown the Northern District of California is a proper forum and the parties agree a change of venue will enhance the convenience of parties and witnesses, the motion is granted.

ANALYSIS

Section 1404(a) of Title 28 provides that “[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought or to any district or division to which all parties have

1 (“Mot.”, Doc. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.