R.
R. v. Blue Shield of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
CENTRAL DIVISION
R.R., and E.R., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
Plaintiffs, MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
v. CALIFORNIA (DOC. NO. 17)
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA,
Case No. 2:22-cv-00502 Defendant. District Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr.
Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg
Plaintiffs R.R. and E.R. brought this Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) action against Defendant Blue Shield of California. The parties have filed a Stipulated Motion to Change Venue to the Northern District of California. Because the parties have shown the Northern District of California is a proper forum and the parties agree a change of venue will enhance the convenience of parties and witnesses, the motion is granted.
ANALYSIS
Section 1404(a) of Title 28 provides that “[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought or to any district or division to which all parties have
1 (“Mot.”, Doc. No.…