Kramer
Kramer v. Peres
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANDREW KRAMER, Case No. 22-cv-03803-WHO (PR)
Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE;
v. ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT
TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION
PACHYINSKI, et al., OR NOTICE REGARDING SUCH
MOTION;
Defendants.
INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK
16 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Andrew Kramer alleges a physician at San Quentin has violated his constitutional and statutory rights. His 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint containing these allegations is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Kramer has stated cognizable claims against Dr. Pachyinski, Chief Medical Executive at San Quentin. All other defendants and claims are DISMISSED. The Court directs defendant Pachyinski to file in response to the complaint a dispositive motion, or a notice regarding such motion, on or before March 6, 2023. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review …