Kramer

Kramer v. Peres

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20223:22-cv-03803California2,125 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANDREW KRAMER, Case No. 22-cv-03803-WHO (PR)

Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE;

v. ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT

TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION

PACHYINSKI, et al., OR NOTICE REGARDING SUCH

MOTION;

Defendants.

INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK

16 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Andrew Kramer alleges a physician at San Quentin has violated his constitutional and statutory rights. His 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint containing these allegations is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Kramer has stated cognizable claims against Dr. Pachyinski, Chief Medical Executive at San Quentin. All other defendants and claims are DISMISSED. The Court directs defendant Pachyinski to file in response to the complaint a dispositive motion, or a notice regarding such motion, on or before March 6, 2023. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.