Bielski

Bielski v. Coinbase Global, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20223:21-cv-07478California1,690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ABRAHAM BIELSKI, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 21-07478 WHA

v.

COINBASE, INC., ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

APPOINT INTERIM CLASS

Defendant.

COUNSEL

15 INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, plaintiffs move for the appointment of interim class counsel under Rule 23(g)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED. STATEMENT Plaintiffs Abraham Bielski, Dzhura Binyaminov, and Auryan Sajjadi seek to represent classes of similarly situated individuals with claims against defendant Coinbase, Inc. for violations of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E, as well as associated state statutes and common law duties. Briefly, the purported facts are as follows: Plaintiffs created accounts on defendant’s cryptocurrency exchange platform. They eventually realized that unauthorized electronic transfers depleted their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.