Li

Li v. Mummah

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20225:22-cv-07626California478 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIANQING LI,

Case No. 22-cv-07626 NC Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE TO OSC FROM CROSS-

PHILLIP MUMMAH, COMPLAINANT MUMMAH; AND

CONSENT/DECLINE TO Defendant and MAGISTRATE JUDGE Cross-Complainant,

JURISDICTION BY LI AND

v. MUMMAH

SCOTT A. FLAXMAN, Re: ECF

Cross-Claim Defendant.

17 Scott A. Flaxman sought to remove the cross-claim filed against him in Santa Clara County Superior Court to this Court. ECF 1, Notice of Removal of Cross-Claim. On December 9, 2022, I issued an Order to Show Cause Regarding Removal, asking Flaxman to explain why the case should not be remanded back to the Superior Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1441 and Home Depot, U.S.A. v. Jackson, 139 S. Ct. 1743, 1745 (2019). ECF 10. A remand order may require payment of just costs and any actual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.