Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20225:22-cv-04325California1,317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Case No. 22-cv-04325-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF FTC'S v. MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE

EVIDENCE CONCERNING THIRD-

META PLATFORMS INC., et al., PARTY WITNESSES

Defendants. 12 Re: ECF No. 280

13 Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) moves in limine to exclude all evidence 14 concerning third-party witnesses Eric Janszen, Jaime Pichardo Garcia, and Preston Lewis on the 15 basis that these witnesses were untimely disclosed. ECF No. 280 (“Motion”). Having considered 16 the arguments presented in the Parties’ briefs and oral arguments, the Court GRANTS IN PART 17 and DENIES IN PART the FTC’s Motion.

I. Legal Standard

19 Rule 26(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires parties to make initial 20 disclosures providing “the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of each 21 individual likely to have discoverable information—along…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.