Amort

Amort v. Ecco Retail, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20224:22-cv-05812California4,293 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WILLIAM M. AMORT, Case No. 22-cv-05812-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND AND

DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

ECCO RETAIL, LLC, et al., TO DISMISS AS MOOT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 8,

Plaintiff William M. Amort filed this putative wage and hour class action in San Mateo County Superior Court against Defendants ECCO Retail, LLC (ECCO Retail); ECCO USA, Inc. (“ECCO USA”); and ECCO. [Docket No. 1 (Notice of Removal Ex. A (Compl.)).] Defendants subsequently removed the case to federal court, invoking the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). Plaintiff now moves to remand. [Docket No. 11.] Defendants move pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint. [Docket No. 8.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion to remand is granted. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.