Sandoval
Sandoval v. Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 PRISCILLA SANDOVAL, Case No. 22-cv-05552-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. REMAND
BEACON ROOFING SUPPLY, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendants.
9 Priscilla Sandoval sued her former employer, Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc., and her former supervisor, Joseph Junsay, in Alameda County Superior Court. Beacon removed to this Court. Plaintiff moves to remand. After carefully considering the arguments and briefing submitted, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand. The hearing scheduled for December 20, 2022, is vacated. DISCUSSION The Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims. Beacon argues this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). But 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) requires complete diversity of citizenship to establish federal jurisdiction…