Nathu

Nathu v. City Of Oakland

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20223:20-cv-05242California10,252 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TULSEE NATHU, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05242-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT

CITY OF OAKLAND, Re: Dkt. Nos. 67, 73 Defendant.

12 Tulsee Nathu, Daxa “Mina” Patel, Jayanti Nathu, II Ram 6801 I-40 West, Amarillo, TX, Ltd., and 1000 RAM Inc., (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this lawsuit against the City of Oakland (“Defendant”) after the Oakland City Council denied Plaintiffs’ request to build a hotel on the Mandela Parkway in Oakland, California. Plaintiffs seek a writ of mandate reversing Defendant’s decision, declaratory relief, and monetary damages. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is now pending before the Court. Having carefully considered the parties’ briefing and having had the benefit of oral argument on October 13, 2022, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ petition for a writ of mandate under California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5 and GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.