Johnson v. City of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20225:21-cv-01849California6,610 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 KYLE JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-01849-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PARTIAL MOTION

v. TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al.,

Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Kyle Johnson alleges that he was seriously injured when Officer James Adgar of the San Jose Police Department fired a less lethal projectile weapon at him during the George Floyd protests in San Jose, California on May 30, 2020. Johnson brings his lawsuit against the City of San Jose (“the City”), Officer Adgar, and other unnamed police officers, asserting claims for battery and negligence and violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the California Bane Act. Defendants moved to dismiss the first amendment claim against Officer Adgar and the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against the City. ECF No. 74 (“MTD”); see also ECF No. 80 (“Reply”). Johnson opposes the motion. ECF No. 79 (“Opp.”). The Court held a hearing on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.