Cruz

Cruz v. Simpson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20224:22-cv-04898California1,894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 22-cv-04898-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

v. DENYING AS MOOT REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME; REQUIRING

R. SIMPSON, PLAINTIFF TO PAY FILING FEE IN

FULL

Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 4

13 Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on or about August 26, 2022. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff has also requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 2. On October 31, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why he should not be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to the three strikes provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Dkt. No. 4. Plaintiff filed his response with the Court on November 17, 2022. Dkt. No. 5. The Court has carefully considered the record and, for the reasons set forth below, DENIES Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.