Coxon

Coxon v. United States District Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20224:22-cv-01407California945 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BENJAMIN COXON, Case No. 22-cv-01407-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING

COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 2 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Benjamin Coxon, representing himself, has filed a complaint against several federal defendants, as well as three revised complaints. Dkt. Nos. 1, 4–6. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 2. I. INTRODUCTION The Court may authorize the commencement of a civil action in forma pauperis if it is satisfied that the would-be plaintiff cannot pay the filing fees necessary to pursue the action. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1); Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). Having reviewed Plaintiff’s application, the Court finds that Plaintiff is unable to pay the full amount of fees, costs, or give security. See Escobedo, 787…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.