In re Google RTB Consumer Privacy Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20224:21-cv-02155California2,232 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

21 This dispute concerns Google’s compliance with the Court’s August 26, 2022 order 22 resolving the parties’ earlier dispute regarding plaintiffs’ discovery of named plaintiff data. Dkt. 23 No. 314. In that order, the Court ordered Google to produce documents sufficient to show several 26 2 Because the hearing involved detailed discussion of Google’s confidential information, the Court conducted the hearing under seal. 27 categories of data relating to the named plaintiffs. As to some disputed categories of information, the Court directed the parties to confer further and, if appropriate, to comply with the procedures the Court established for considering materials from the Calhoun litigation. Plaintiffs say that Google’s production of named plaintiff data is incomplete. They argue that Google has chosen to produce data principally from the , but neglected other sources that contain unique data about information Google shares with RTB participants. Dkt. No. 365 at 2. Specifically, plaintiffs argue that Google should be required to search for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.