Nguyen

Nguyen v. Wells Fargo, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20223:20-cv-07991California2,327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PHUONG T. NGUYEN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-07991-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

WELLS FARGO, N.A., et al., Docket Nos. 71, 73 Defendants.

12 13 The Court entered a final judgment in the instant action (hereinafter referred to as “Nguyen I”) in January 2021, after concluding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. See Docket No. 63 (order). Almost two years later, the federal government asked that Nguyen be related to another action (hereinafter referred to as “Nguyen II”). Plaintiff Phuong Nguyen opposed relation, as did another party in Nguyen II, Michael Flores. After Ms. Nguyen and Mr. Flores filed their briefs in opposition to the motion to relate, some of the defendants in Nguyen I moved for sanctions. That is the motion now pending before the Court. The sanctions motion was formally filed by the Wells Fargo Defendants. The A.J.E. Defendants have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.