Diaz

Diaz v. Tesla, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20223:17-cv-06748California6,361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OWEN DIAZ, Case No. 3:17-cv-06748-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING NEW TRIAL ON

v. LIABILITY

TESLA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 359 Defendants.

12 After a jury verdict assigning Tesla liability and awarding plaintiff Owen Diaz compensatory and punitive damages, and after I denied Tesla’s motion for a new trial on liability and damages, it moves again for a new trial on liability and damages. But I already decided this question. There appears to be no reason—aside from strategic gamesmanship—that Tesla could not have made these same arguments when I previously decided this issue. Tesla’s motion is judicially estopped and procedurally barred. In addition, it fails on the merits. For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied. BACKGROUND The facts and procedural background of this case are recounted in detail in my April 13, 2022, Order on Post Trial Motions. [Dkt. No. 328]. That…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.