Pock

Pock v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20223:19-cv-01354-JSCCalifornia1,168 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES P., Case No. 19-cv-01354-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: AMENDED MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEY’S FEES

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. No. 36 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff’s counsel, Harvey Sackett, moves for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) for representing Plaintiff in his successful appeal of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s denial of social security disability benefits. (Dkt. No. 36.) After careful consideration of Plaintiff’s amended motion and the relevant legal authority, the Court determines that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS the amended motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to Section 406(b). BACKGROUND This case stems from Plaintiff’s appeal of the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA’s”) denial of social security benefits for a combination of physical and mental impairments, including: degenerative disc…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.