Hicks

Hicks v. Wong

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20223:22-cv-08663California177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL HICKS, Case No. 22-cv-08663-JD Plaintiff, y. ORDER RE DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 2 BAO WONG, et al., ll Defendants.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights action. Court records indicate that 14 || plaintiff already proceeds with a case in this Court concerning similar claims. See Hicks □□□ Dr. Yeah, Case No. 22-cv-6865 JD. This case is dismissed as duplicative. See Adams vy. Cal. Dept. of a || Health Services, 487 F.3d 684, 688 (9th Cir. 2007). Plaintiff should proceed with all of his claims || in the earlier filed case. S For the foregoing reasons, this case is DISMISSED as duplicative. The pending motion || (Dkt. No. 2) is VACATED. No fee is due. The Clerk is requested to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 16, 2022 22

JAMES D#MATO

United Stf{tes District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.