Cruz
Cruz v. Valdez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 22-cv-04627-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;
v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY
FILING FEE IN FULL; DENYING AS
VALDEZ, et al., MOOT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME
Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 5
13 Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on or about August 1, 2022. Dkt. No. 1; Dkt. No. 1-1. Plaintiff also requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 2, and filed a pleading titled “Statement of Three-Strike Provision by Guillermo Trujillo Cruz,” Dkt. No. 3, wherein he alleges that he meets the “imminent danger” exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1915’s three-strikes provision. On October 31, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why he should not be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to the three strikes provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915. …