Cruz

Cruz v. Valdez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20224:22-cv-04627California2,052 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 22-cv-04627-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY

FILING FEE IN FULL; DENYING AS

VALDEZ, et al., MOOT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME

Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 5

13 Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on or about August 1, 2022. Dkt. No. 1; Dkt. No. 1-1. Plaintiff also requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 2, and filed a pleading titled “Statement of Three-Strike Provision by Guillermo Trujillo Cruz,” Dkt. No. 3, wherein he alleges that he meets the “imminent danger” exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1915’s three-strikes provision. On October 31, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why he should not be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to the three strikes provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.