Clancy

Clancy v. Mancuso

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20225:22-cv-02381California3,139 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NORMAN CLANCY, Case No. 22-cv-02381-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DECLARING NORMAN

v. CLANCY A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT

AND IMPOSING PRE-FILING

JERRY MANCUSO; GERALD BITTNER; REVIEW REQUIREMENT and KEITH COOPER, [Re: ECF 21] Defendants.

14 This is the third federal action, and sixth action overall, that pro se Plaintiff Norman Clancy (“Clancy”) has filed against Defendants Jerry Mancuso (“Mancuso”), Gerald Bittner (“Bittner”), and Keith Cooper (“Cooper”) regarding dental services they provided to him. Before the Court is Mancuso’s motion for an order declaring Clancy to be a vexatious litigant and requiring Clancy to obtain leave of court before filing any future lawsuits against Mancuso, Bittner, and/or Cooper. See Mancuso’s Mot., ECF 21. On November 30, 2022, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why Clancy should not be declared a vexatious litigant. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.