Sifuentes

Sifuentes v. Google Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20223:22-cv-03102California2,057 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, Case No. 22-cv-03102-JCS

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

VACATE ORDER COMPELLING

v. ARBITRATION AND MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO AMEND

GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 33,

I. INTRODUCITON Plaintiff David Angel Sifuentes, pro se, filed this case against Defendant Google1 on May 26, 2022 asserting claims based on bills he received for Google Fi cell phone service, but after Google moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, dkt. 16, Sifuentes moved to compel arbitration of his own claims and stay the case pursuant to an arbitration agreement purportedly included in Google’s terms of use, dkt. 23. Google did not oppose arbitration. Dkt. 28. On August 31, 2022, the Court granted Sifuentes’s motion, denied without prejudice Google’s motion to dismiss, stayed the case, and ordered Sifuentes “to file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.